Don McLean: The value of local school boards
School boards have long been a target for withering criticism, and, indeed, we often think of boards in some states banning books, enabling segregation, and in general, living up to a famous Mark Twain quip about school boards — which you may easily find on Google. But I found the school board members I worked with — both in Guilford and in the larger district — to be intelligent, supportive of our teachers, progressive on policy, committed to the concerns of taxpayers, and dedicated to the students.
School board members receive a modest stipend — it varies from town to town, but in Guilford was $800 per year when I served 20 years ago, and it's still the same today. One of my colleagues and I amused ourselves once by calculating that counting work on both town and district committees, we were being paid well under minimum wage. In fact, the service provided by board members gives the taxpayers the best return on their money of any of the positions within the supervisory union. As Act 46 purports to have as one of its goals a brake on costs, it would seem the Vermont legislature has given us a mandate to make a drastic cut on exactly the wrong end of the animal.
There's also the already widely discussed issue of local control. It does feel as though the folks in Montpelier don't trust us in the towns to know what works best in our own school system.
Don McLean lives in Guilford. The opinions expressed by columnists do not necessarily reflect the views of the Brattleboro Reformer.
TALK TO US
If you'd like to leave a comment (or a tip or a question) about this story with the editors, please email us. We also welcome letters to the editor for publication; you can do that by filling out our letters form and submitting it to the newsroom.