Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.  

Editor of the Reformer: I was surprised and confused when I read the front page article in the Reformer from January 9-10, “Merger break pitched for WSESD.” Since then, I have spent hours attending meetings and researching this proposal in an attempt to understand its implications. It turns out that there are many unanswered questions and potentially concerning outcomes. And yet, voters in Brattleboro, Dummerston, Guilford, and Putney must decide to approve or oppose these articles on the March 2 Town Meeting ballot.

I urge you to vote No for the following reasons:

The merged district has financial benefits, and breaking it up would result in higher tax rates for all towns.

WSESD has articles of agreement that protect our small schools. If we dissolve the district, we lose those protections. We could be forced to merge again, without those articles of agreement.

This vote is ill-timed. We should be focusing on helping our students, teachers, school staff, and administrators continue to weather the stressful impacts of the pandemic. Breaking up our school district will undoubtedly cause more work and more stress for them.

Given the newness of the merged district, we haven’t had a chance to assess the benefits and drawbacks. WSESD has existed for about a year and a half, and has been important in helping schools operate during the pandemic. There is great potential for shared resources under the umbrella of the district but schools operating in isolation would lose that potential for collaboration.

If a town leaves WSESD or if the district dissolves, the BUHS 6 district would not be reestablished, which could have damaging implications for our high school in the long run.

There seems to be concern that if we don’t break up the merged structure now, we won’t be able to in the future, due to potential legislation that might take away the right to dissolve a merged board. According to our legislators, there is no current or pending legislation aimed at this issue at the moment.

A yes vote on these articles would not reverse Act 46. It would create higher taxes for our towns and instability for our schools. Please vote No.

Sarah Rosow

Guilford, Feb. 16

Talk with us

Since COVID-19 makes it difficult to convene Coffees with the President, if you have a question or a comment about The Eagle, send it to company President Fredric D. Rutberg at frutberg@berkshireeagle.com